<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 49 utopias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/05/49-utopias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/05/49-utopias/</link>
	<description>the herculez gomez of architecture blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ownership culture - mammoth // building nothing out of something</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/05/49-utopias/comment-page-1/#comment-3117</link>
		<dc:creator>ownership culture - mammoth // building nothing out of something</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=233#comment-3117</guid>
		<description>[...] those options is best, but I will say that Stephen and I have been trying to develop a consistent argument that it is best to do architecture (even paper architecture) in a way that, at the very least, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those options is best, but I will say that Stephen and I have been trying to develop a consistent argument that it is best to do architecture (even paper architecture) in a way that, at the very least, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: on finance - mammoth // building nothing out of something</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/05/49-utopias/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>on finance - mammoth // building nothing out of something</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=233#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] The design of the mechanisms by which our tactical interventions (or unfortunate master plan extravaganzas) are funded has deep and profound implications, not just for the binary question of whether or not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The design of the mechanisms by which our tactical interventions (or unfortunate master plan extravaganzas) are funded has deep and profound implications, not just for the binary question of whether or not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

