<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/11/the-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/11/the-cloud/</link>
	<description>the herculez gomez of architecture blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: namhenderson</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/11/the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>namhenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=1029#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>Hey dudes,
I like the top image more than the one in the BBC article. 
More photo-realistic less shiny render. Plus, the structure looks lighter/more ethereal. Smaller footprint. I think it also has something to do with the foggy/blurred filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dudes,<br />
I like the top image more than the one in the BBC article.<br />
More photo-realistic less shiny render. Plus, the structure looks lighter/more ethereal. Smaller footprint. I think it also has something to do with the foggy/blurred filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

