<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: chinampas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/02/chinampas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/02/chinampas/</link>
	<description>the herculez gomez of architecture blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rholmes</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/02/chinampas/comment-page-1/#comment-8299</link>
		<dc:creator>rholmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=1946#comment-8299</guid>
		<description>See, now I&#039;m feeling bad, for my lazy reading of your post (I read it all, but too quickly, and missed the chinampas reference).  And now I just look like a biter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, now I&#8217;m feeling bad, for my lazy reading of your post (I read it all, but too quickly, and missed the chinampas reference).  And now I just look like a biter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faslanyc</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/02/chinampas/comment-page-1/#comment-8298</link>
		<dc:creator>faslanyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=1946#comment-8298</guid>
		<description>yes, xochimilco was kind of a modern take, though perhaps a bit superficial.  nonetheless, interesting- this cultural landscape cum landscape ecology.

yes, in fact i had a little paragraph at the end that mentioned/linked to the chinampas and how they related to &lt;i&gt;chubs&lt;/i&gt; and the idea of lo fi landscapes.

kate orff seems to be a big proponent of this approach, including the latest rising tides stuff she&#039;s doing.  i haven&#039;t had a chance to look it over well, but it piques my interest at first glance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, xochimilco was kind of a modern take, though perhaps a bit superficial.  nonetheless, interesting- this cultural landscape cum landscape ecology.</p>
<p>yes, in fact i had a little paragraph at the end that mentioned/linked to the chinampas and how they related to <i>chubs</i> and the idea of lo fi landscapes.</p>
<p>kate orff seems to be a big proponent of this approach, including the latest rising tides stuff she&#8217;s doing.  i haven&#8217;t had a chance to look it over well, but it piques my interest at first glance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/02/chinampas/comment-page-1/#comment-8292</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=1946#comment-8292</guid>
		<description>I enjoy Schjetnan, as well (though I&#039;m only &lt;a href=&quot;http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/05/below-the-phreatic-level/#comment-134&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;relatively recently familiar&lt;/a&gt; with his work) -- and I think (after checking on it) that his Xochimilco park does in fact &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gdu.com.mx/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=101&amp;Itemid=136&amp;lang=en_US&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;claim&lt;/a&gt; to be inspired by (though I don&#039;t think it really integrates) the chinampas.

Would the chinampas be an example of what you were calling a &lt;a href=&quot;http://faslanyc.blogspot.com/2010/02/lo-fi-landscapes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lo-fi landscape&lt;/a&gt;?  I kind of think so (and that one could probably come up with a modern take on the chinampas that would fit even better)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy Schjetnan, as well (though I&#8217;m only <a href="http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/05/below-the-phreatic-level/#comment-134" rel="nofollow">relatively recently familiar</a> with his work) &#8212; and I think (after checking on it) that his Xochimilco park does in fact <a href="http://www.gdu.com.mx/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=101&amp;Itemid=136&amp;lang=en_US" rel="nofollow">claim</a> to be inspired by (though I don&#8217;t think it really integrates) the chinampas.</p>
<p>Would the chinampas be an example of what you were calling a <a href="http://faslanyc.blogspot.com/2010/02/lo-fi-landscapes.html" rel="nofollow">lo-fi landscape</a>?  I kind of think so (and that one could probably come up with a modern take on the chinampas that would fit even better)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faslanyc</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/02/chinampas/comment-page-1/#comment-8273</link>
		<dc:creator>faslanyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=1946#comment-8273</guid>
		<description>yep, the chinampas are pretty cool- sophisticated, low tech interventions that adapt over time.

mario schjetnan has done a career&#039;s worth of interesting work down in that area, working with similar ideas, though i don&#039;t believe he ever integrated chinampas...

he&#039;s very interesting though.  another one of those old timer&#039;s who was doing landscape infrastructure before landscape infrastructure was landscape infrastructure.

he has a nice barragan-esque aesthetic, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, the chinampas are pretty cool- sophisticated, low tech interventions that adapt over time.</p>
<p>mario schjetnan has done a career&#8217;s worth of interesting work down in that area, working with similar ideas, though i don&#8217;t believe he ever integrated chinampas&#8230;</p>
<p>he&#8217;s very interesting though.  another one of those old timer&#8217;s who was doing landscape infrastructure before landscape infrastructure was landscape infrastructure.</p>
<p>he has a nice barragan-esque aesthetic, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

