Comments on: “anchors in a mutable field” http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/07/anchors-in-a-mutable-field/ the herculez gomez of architecture blogs Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:02:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: rholmes http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/07/anchors-in-a-mutable-field/comment-page-1/#comment-18655 rholmes Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:34:26 +0000 http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=3109#comment-18655 I've read the Mississippi book, but not the Deccan Traverses. Both are kind of hard to come by, but worth digging up a copy of if you can (even if it's just an inter-library loan or something). They're definitely documents that you want to see as physical objects. I’ve read the Mississippi book, but not the Deccan Traverses. Both are kind of hard to come by, but worth digging up a copy of if you can (even if it’s just an inter-library loan or something). They’re definitely documents that you want to see as physical objects.

]]> By: namhenderson http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/07/anchors-in-a-mutable-field/comment-page-1/#comment-18594 namhenderson Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:38:21 +0000 http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=3109#comment-18594 I really liked that Places piece. Their Mississippi and Deccan's books have been on my to read list for too long. Have you read either? Maybe one could be the next book club selection? I particularly liked their model of activist practice which took (for the Mumbai project at least) an almost public "marketing" informational campaign using curatorial, tools mixed with PSA type outreach. I really liked that Places piece. Their Mississippi and Deccan’s books have been on my to read list for too long. Have you read either? Maybe one could be the next book club selection?

I particularly liked their model of activist practice which took (for the Mumbai project at least) an almost public “marketing” informational campaign using curatorial, tools mixed with PSA type outreach.

]]>