<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mammoth &#187; architecture-as-infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m.ammoth.us/blog/tag/architecture-as-infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog</link>
	<description>the herculez gomez of architecture blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>haiti rewired: quinta monroy, hackability, incremental housing</title>
		<link>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/01/haiti-rewired-quinta-monroy-hackability-incremental-housing/</link>
		<comments>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/01/haiti-rewired-quinta-monroy-hackability-incremental-housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rholmes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-expanded-field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture-as-infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental-housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.ammoth.us/blog/?p=1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a bit over a week now (presuming I&#8217;ve got the timeline right), Wired&#8216;s been building a very interesting community at their subsite Haiti Rewired, aimed at developing &#8220;tech and infrastructure solutions for Haiti&#8221;.  A couple of items there tie back into the themes mammoth discussed in relation to Quinta Monroy: first, this brief post [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a bit over a week now (presuming I&#8217;ve got the timeline right), <em>Wired</em>&#8216;s been building a very interesting community at their subsite <a href="http://haitirewired.wired.com/">Haiti Rewired</a>, <a href="http://haitirewired.wired.com/profiles/blogs/haiti-rewireds-mission">aimed at developing</a> &#8220;tech and infrastructure solutions for Haiti&#8221;.  A couple of items there tie back into the themes <em>mammoth </em><a href="http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/01/the-best-architecture-of-the-decade/">discussed</a> in relation to Quinta Monroy: first, this <a href="http://haitirewired.wired.com/profiles/blogs/can-haitian-homes-be-built-for">brief post</a> by Alexis Madrigal asks if built and rebuilt homes can be constructed for &#8220;hackability&#8221;, which is a tech-ish way to describe the central property of the Quinta Monroy project, and second, <a href="http://haitirewired.wired.com/profiles/blogs/the-pros-and-cons-of">this more extensive post</a> by Luke Perry, whose Branner fellowship research blog, <a href="http://incrementalhouse.blogspot.com/">The Incremental House</a>, <em>mammoth </em>pointed to previously, both describes &#8220;incremental housing&#8221; as a concept and thoughtfully explains its applicability to the tragic situation in Haiti.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/01/haiti-rewired-quinta-monroy-hackability-incremental-housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

