{"id":3949,"date":"2010-10-24T14:28:07","date_gmt":"2010-10-24T19:28:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/?p=3949"},"modified":"2010-10-24T14:28:55","modified_gmt":"2010-10-24T19:28:55","slug":"future-legitimacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/2010\/10\/future-legitimacy\/","title":{"rendered":"future legitimacy"},"content":{"rendered":"

BLDGBLOG<\/em> recently ran an interview with Jeffrey Inaba<\/a>, which sent me plunging back into the BLDGBLOG <\/em>archives to re-read a trio of interviews that Geoff conducted in 2007 with Inaba<\/a> and two of the other editors of Volume, Ole Bouman<\/a> and Mark Wigley<\/a>. \u00a0I could share any number of excerpts from those interviews, as each is quite excellent, but this exchange between BLDGBLOG<\/em> and Bouman on the relationship between architects and clients is particularly interesting:<\/p>\n

Bouman<\/strong>: …Of course, there are at least three different layers of clients. First of all, there are the people with money who want a program to be accommodated by an architectural work \u2013 in other words, a\u00a0client<\/em> in the traditional sense. But I don\u2019t think that there is a sufficient market for a magazine that would address that specific group.<\/p>\n

There is also the\u00a0client<\/em>, in terms of the decision-maker. Maybe that person is not about to commission an architect to do something\u00a0now<\/em>, but they may ask an architect to do something\u00a0in the future<\/em>. And there are decision-makers throughout society \u2013 so this is a much larger group. If magazines can address this group of decision-makers specifically, then they already have a bigger reader base.<\/p>\n

But, of course, there is also a group of clients that thinks, maybe in a more metaphorical way, about architecture as a way of fulfilling their dreams or serving their interests, in both a material way and in a more idealistic sense. And if our readership is this larger group of people \u2013 a very mixed group \u2013 then you could say that we already do address clients as the people\u00a0who ask questions to architects<\/em> \u2013 not just ask for buildings from architects, but who ask architects to engage with these issues. They ask architects to address larger social issues, rather than just supply built stuff. This is a redefinition of architecture, from delivering an object to a definition of architecture that challenges certain issues within a larger cultural strategy.<\/p>\n

I think there could be a great dialogue between architects and this group of people. And this spirit and interpretation of the client is perhaps what we are addressing. Of course, the question comes up: is it still necessary to call this group\u00a0clients<\/em> and not just\u00a0the public<\/em>? But I think it is a nice way to put it: to see those people, this larger group of people engaged in cultural issues, as\u00a0clients<\/em>, who ask questions without an immediate budget, without pointing at a specific site, without asking you to accommodate a program. They ask general questions of architecture, and that helps us mobilize architecture beyond one specific purpose.<\/p>\n

BLDGBLOG<\/strong>:\u00a0So we need a new, or different, kind of architect now, in addition to a new way of interacting with clients?<\/em><\/p>\n

Bouman<\/strong>: Yes \u2013 and that brings me to the role of the architect in responding to the client. This can no longer be the reactive way that most architects work with clients. In the first definition I gave of the client, the client is asking a question:\u00a0Architect X or Architect Y, can you do something for me, because I need you?<\/em> The output of architecture, in that sense, is very\u00a0reactive<\/em>. It can only be based on a program, a budget, a site, an existing location, etc. etc. \u2013 but there is always something coming\u00a0first<\/em>, before the architectural act.<\/p>\n

In the other description I gave of the client, there is more of a shared interest \u2013 a common interest \u2013 with architects addressing a cultural or political issue from the angle of architecture. So there is a dialogue between different people with a common curiosity, and that can evolve into a completely different output of the architectural discipline. It gives architects a new role, I think, in the long-term, and this may even give architecture its future legitimacy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the entire interview here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BLDGBLOG recently ran an interview with Jeffrey Inaba, which sent me plunging back into the BLDGBLOG archives to re-read a trio of interviews that Geoff conducted in 2007 with Inaba and two of the other editors of Volume, Ole Bouman and Mark Wigley. \u00a0I could share any number of excerpts from those interviews, as each […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,10,127,397],"tags":[210,482,483],"class_list":["post-3949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-architecture","category-asides","category-readings","category-the-expanded-field","tag-bldgblog","tag-clients","tag-ole-bouman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3949"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3949\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3951,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3949\/revisions\/3951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}