{"id":4670,"date":"2011-05-03T13:10:07","date_gmt":"2011-05-03T18:10:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/?p=4670"},"modified":"2011-05-03T13:12:15","modified_gmt":"2011-05-03T18:12:15","slug":"a-pre-modern-critique-of-the-new-urbanism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/2011\/05\/a-pre-modern-critique-of-the-new-urbanism\/","title":{"rendered":"a pre-modern critique of the new urbanism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A minor point, but <a href=\"http:\/\/oldurbanist.blogspot.com\/2011\/05\/new-urbanism-on-narrow-streets-rhetoric.html\">this is kind of fascinating<\/a> &#8212; a critique of New Urbanism which, rather than going the common route of charging New Urbanism with nostalgic pre-modernism, argues that New Urbanism is insufficiently pre-modern &#8212; in this specific case, arguing that New Urbanists have praised a certain kind of narrow traditional street but produced a zoning code which doesn&#8217;t permit the construction of that kind of street.\u00a0 (It&#8217;s a bit like a right-wing critique of Wall Street &#8212; there&#8217;s certainly room to make it, but you don&#8217;t hear it often.)\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newworldeconomics.com\/archives\/2010\/100310.html\">These guys<\/a> should be introduced to <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=cC4RAQAAMAAJ&amp;dq=rudofsky%20streets%20for%20people&amp;source=gbs_book_other_versions\">Rudofsky<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=hwAHmktpk5IC&amp;pg=PA491&amp;lpg=PA491&amp;dq=christopher+alexander+pattern+language+100+pedestrian+street&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=AIYDA9otoD&amp;sig=MF2H7TSHImV5lLPlaKaotAYXJhI&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=TETATZSQL464tgfQhtS4BQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\">Alexander<\/a>, who (for what it&#8217;s worth) were arguing for a return to pre-modern urban patterns years before the New Urbanists showed up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A minor point, but this is kind of fascinating &#8212; a critique of New Urbanism which, rather than going the common route of charging New Urbanism with nostalgic pre-modernism, argues that New Urbanism is insufficiently pre-modern &#8212; in this specific case, arguing that New Urbanists have praised a certain kind of narrow traditional street but [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,5],"tags":[578,215,576,577,403],"class_list":["post-4670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asides","category-urbanism","tag-christopher-alexander","tag-new-urbanism","tag-pre-modern","tag-rudofsky","tag-streets"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4670"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4672,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4670\/revisions\/4672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/m.ammoth.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}