mammoth // building nothing out of something

this is your brain. this is your brain on architecture.

I haven’t read this yet, but it looks remarkably interesting. The lede:

Architects have long intuited that the places we inhabit can affect our thoughts, feelings and behaviors. Now behavioral scientists are giving their hunches an empirical basis.
Scientists are unearthing tantalizing clues about how to design spaces that promote creativity, keep students focused and alert, and lead to relaxation and social intimacy. The results inform architectural and design decisions such as the height of ceilings, the view from windows, the shape of furniture, and the type and intensity of lighting.
Such efforts are leading to cutting-edge projects such as residences for seniors with dementia in which the building itself is part of the treatment.

biofuel skepticism

Biofuel skepticism — both cellulose alcohol and algae — albeit from a source with an obvious (and stated) agenda. While I’m skeptical of these skeptics’ agenda, the environmental and political problems that have resulted from pushing first-generation biofuels (corn ethanol, palm oil) here and abroad suggest that its worth at least listening to the skeptics while architects push ahead with work that incorporates these technologies, regardless of whether these particular forms of biofuels prove workable over the long-term or not.

[via Pruned]

the most sublime room in the world

The French keep all of the nuclear waste from the last thirty years of energy production in one room, the storage vault at La Hague.

la hague in penisular context

portion of la hague facility [google maps]

If, as the landscape theorist Beth Meyers has suggested, sublime sentiments can be stirred by the juxtaposition of knowledge of invisible danger with the regimented beauty of industrial architecture, then this gymnasium-sized room (and, by extension, perhaps the whole of La Hague) might be the most sublime place on the planet.

I was alerted to the existence of this room by a single sentence in an article on Infrastructurist about the closing of the Yucca Mountain facility. The author of that article, William Tucker, has written at length about the French nuclear program; but it is his description of a tour of La Hague which fascinates me:

And suddenly, there it is before us. Like some benthic organism being hauled out of the deep, a complete fuel assembly is slowing rising out of the floor, lifted by an overhead crane, until it reaches the full height of the room. With its steel frame and vertical black lines – the fuel rods – it looks eerily like a miniaturized version of the World Trade Center. Yet its blank and featureless face has the soulless menace of a shark’s eye.

“What’s the radiation coming out of that thing?”

Naugnot consults quickly with a nuclear engineer who speaks only French.

“Un million millirads,” says the engineer. A million millirem. Quick calculation -that’s 1000 rems. The highest exposure people got standing near ground zero at Hiroshima was only 500 rems. This is truly the most powerful and dangerous material on earth. Yet here we are, perfectly shielded by a foot of lead-laced glass. If we suffer the slightest exposure, the full-body radiation detectors will catch it when we leave.

“How long has it been since someone was in that room?”

“Not since it was built. And they won’t be in there again until years after it’s decommissioned. If you walked in there now, you’d be killed instantly.”

I have not been able to locate a image of that first room, which may not be a bad thing for the purposes of this post, as I suspect that being able to see the space — and its apparent emptiness — would likely trick the mind into thinking it less threatening than it really is. Better to imagine it as an invisible yellow hole than to see a photograph which cannot capture the flood of radiation.

The second room is bathed in an gorgeous blue glow — the visible signature of Cerenkov radiation from stacked spent fuel, held harmless underwater.

the swimming pool at la hague [source]

The next stop is the “swimming pool,” a larger version of the storage pools that hold spent fuel at almost every nuclear plant. This one is near-Olympic size. The blue Cerenkov glow is fainter, giving it the color of one of those horrible kids’ kool-aid flavors. As we scan the perimeter I suddenly see something wildly incongruous and yet perfectly appropriate – life preservers hanging about every twenty yards along the guardrail – a perfect conjunction of high- and low-tech.

The water is apparently so effective at neutralizing the radioactivity of the spent fuel that Tucker tells the French tour guide of American nuclear plant workers who have snuck illicit swims in storage pools — though Tucker gives the impression that he is not entirely convinced by those claims.

The final room — home to all thirty years of nuclear waste — is anticlimactic, after the described power of the first room and the vivid reminder of the atomic forces in play provided by the Cerenkov radiation in the second. But this is the glistening heart of La Hague:

the most sublime room at la hague [source]

It is a bit larger than I imagined. Somehow I had seen it as about the size of a small visitors’ center. Instead it is more like a large basketball gymnasium. Still, it’s one large room. In the floor there are about 40 manhole covers stenciled with Areva’s triangular logo. All are so tightly sealed with no visible handles it seems impossible they could ever be removed.

more
::Article discussing the process at La Hague as well as the trade-offs involved in reprocessing spent fuel (as is done at La Hague).
::This post originally appeared on eatingbark.

slave labor and ecological urbanism

Finally got around to reading the article that Becker posted on Dubai; it is very disappointing that these problems were glossed over/not presented at all during discussion of Masdar (which is not in Dubai, but another one of the Emirates, Abu-Dhabi) and Dubai at the Ecological Urbanism conference, particuarly since (a) the discussion of Masdar and Dubai was some of the most contentious discussion at the conference and (b) Bhabha and Kwinter started the conference with a plea for an “existential” urbanism, which, if it means anything, surely must mean grounding urbanism in a deep regard for the value of human life and experience.  Which would probably, at the bare minimum, mean that knowing your designs will (at the very least, potentially) be built by slave laborers should produce a bit of cognitivie dissonance for the Westerner hired by Emiratis.  There’s some sort of wierd comment on post-colonialism in there, as well, but I haven’t teased it out yet.

a state of crisis

I could be wrong about this, I suppose, but I’d say that the ASLA’s continued fixation (“a state of crisis”, “international embarrassment”) on the quality of the turf grass at the National Mall (which remains, despite the patchy grass, a perfectly functional space, as demonstrated recently by the Inauguration) is symptomatic of the kind of thinking (we shrub up and decorate) about the profession of landscape architecture which will ensure that the profession remains irrelevant and impotent for decades to come.  If, at a moment when there is more opportunity to affect real change in national transportation funding priorities than at any other time in my lifetime or to reconsider both the social and spatial consequences of an economy based on the mirage of ever-rising suburban housing prices or to confront problematic infrastructures which treat water as a problem to be shunted rapidly away from cities, rather than as a resource, the primary body representing landscape architects as a whole chooses to focus on the quality of the carpeting in a symbolic space, then we deserve our irrelevance.

And continued irrelevance would be a real shame, because landscape architecture possesses a combination of disciplinary interests (ecology, urbanism, infrastructure, a history of subtlety, etc.) and a set of the analytical tools which could give it real relevance to the challenges designers and cities will face in those coming decades.

The Endurance of Cities, pt.1

I went to an interesting lecture put on by the architecture league Monday night. From the description on their website:

“Eric Firley will discuss his recent research for the book The Urban Housing Handbook (Wiley, 2009), co-authored with Caroline Stahl. Exploring the relationship between architecture and the urban fabric, the handbook provides graphic representations and analysis of 30 urban case studies from around the world. These range from the London town house to apartments in Chicago and New York, taking in other European, South American, North African, and Asian examples. In each chapter, a housing type is fully explored through a traditional case study and a more modern example that demonstrates how it as been reinterpreted in a contemporary context.”

Rob’s recent link to the satellite images tracing Las Vegas over the past 20 years leads-in to this post nicely, because what struck me as Firley was talking about the ten or so examples chosen from the book* was how static the urban fabric in each locale remained over time. Generally, the most drastic changes involved use – single family to multi-family, the occasional introduction of retail into what was formerly residential space, etc. But the street grid, the organization of events and uses, the general typology of the buildings, all remained virtually unchanged from the initial plan. It didn’t matter what sort of urban housing typology it was (single family, multi-family, courtyard house, row house, apartment, etc), what political context (capitalist, socialist, democratic, oligarchy), or what geographical context; none were more accepting of shifts or alterations to the urban grid, suggesting something intrinsic to urbanity which RESISTS change – that the city is not as malleable as we often like to believe.** The contemporary examples shown were often bravissimo demonstrations of an architect’s ability to play on the existing rules and historical norms of a place; but they did almost nothing to change the surrounding urban schema or organization. In fact, most of the more exiting examples were so precisely because the architect’s had to develop such novel solutions to working within odd existing plots or unalterable existing architectures.

Now, every architect has had to work within tight regulations from urban planning boards, or within a challenging site: this is ubiquitous to our profession. But I was surprised that in a book which examines so many urban housing conditions from all over the world with an historical range from anywhere between 50 – 300+ years, not a single example of even moderate shifting of an urban patterning was shown. During the Q and A session afterward (which was lovely, there was plenty of wine and it was a small group, two key conditions for a lively discussion) I asked Firley if the lack of urban evolution was an editorial decision, or if it was representative of what he came across while traveling and researching the book; he indicated that it was the latter.

Of course, arguing cities are unchanging is obviously false.  But what sort of change do we see; and does it give the impression of more fundamental morphological evolution which is, in fact, not happening?  And what are the instances in which change like that has happened?

Read More »

twenty-five years of las vegas

Las Vegas, first in 1984 and then in 2009:

[via NASA’s Earth Observatory]

materials, thrillingly

http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/surfacestructurefold.html

Architects, more like this, please. Script corporeal properties, not falsely determinist “energy flows”.

new books!

New Books!

On the left (The author’s blog is absolutely worth reading regularly as well.)

On the right

Has anyone else read either of them? I’ll post some thoughts as I work my way though.

UPDATE:
Speaking of books, this one has just been added to my must-buy list, and I’m on the waiting list for this gem.

the dubai slave state

 In Dubai, everyone is a slave: Expats to their remaining sources of income, and themselves; Emiratis to The State; and the Workers, to everyone. Tragic, a must -read piece of reporting.

Via Sullivan

on a more positive note

Its not exactly high-speed rail, but, unlike Becker’s state, mine is adding rail service — Richmond-DC and Lynchburg-Charlottesville-DC, which should allow me to realize my dream of living in the Fan District and commuting to DC. Which isn’t to disagree at all with what Stephen noted — there is a real problem in the disconnect between Obama’s rhetoric on rail and his action on rail

Side note: a bit of context in that ABCNews story would be nice — while eight billion dollars sounds like a grand investment in high speed rail and unfortunately really does qualify as “the biggest commitment of its kind ever made by the federal government”, it also isn’t enough to build any one of the currently proposed lines in California (which has the most advanced plans) and doesn’t look particularly impressive in the context of routes under construction worldwide.  Which isn’t to say that its awful — it is far better than nothing — but only that excitement ought to be tempered by the realization that this is only a first step.

[Virginia intercity rail story via Daniel Nairn]

the cemetery as landscape memory

Via bldgblog’s links bar, the northeast corner of Calvary Cemetery in St. Louis, a 477-acre cemetery inside the city limits which concealed for over a century — and accidentally preserved, through neglect — a 25-acre remnant of tallgrass prairie, the grassland ecosystem which once flowed across the midwest, carried by seed and fire, capped by grasses higher than a man’s head.

don’t mess with my trains

The dearth of funding for enhancing existing public transit infrastructure must be one of the stimulus bill’s biggest shortcomings. This story about the T hits particularly close to home for me, as I regularly depend on the Worcester/Framingham line out of Boston to get into the city, and to Logan Airport.  As some commenters on that post argue, this may just be how politics is played in Boston – but that misses what in my mind is a damning indictment of the way stimulus money is being spent (thanks to Cohn in the above article for this link).  No reasonably well managed mass transit system in the country should have to be worried about money with all the dollars currently floating around.

on koolhaas at ecological urbanism

I’m afraid that this cartoon is exactly right: Koolhaas’ keynote address at the Ecological Urbanism conference was a joke (on the attendees?). But, then, a very cynical person might say that this is typical, rather than atypical, of his recent work. Fortunately some of the other presentations were much better.

ecological urbanism conference, briefly

Reactions to last weekend’s Ecological Urbanism conference at GSD that are worth reading include: GSD student blog, Varnelis on informality, and Javier Arbona on the (mis)application of the term ‘ecological’ to architecture.

bracket: hydrating luanda

The following is a study of a hypothetical water farming infrastructure for the arid city of Luanda, Angola; using fog harvesting nets with varying capabilities.

Luanda, the fastest growing city in the world, is desperately short of clean water. Only one in six Luandan households has running water, forcing most of the inhabitants of the musseques (the vast slums that constitute the majority of Luanda’s land area) to depend on contaminated water brought by truck from rivers hours north and south of the city. The price of water in the musseques can be as high as 12 cents a gallon, a huge burden on a populace which lives on an average of $2 per person per day. In 2006, the worst African cholera epidemic in a decade devastated the musseques, killing 1600, spread by contaminated drinking water as well as contact with sewage.

What if water, already inextricable from agricultural farming processes, was itself farmed? Beyond the direct benefits a renewable source of fresh, clean water would provide Luanda, farming water seeds the city with potential. By establishing an infrastructure to effect the farming of water, one may farm landscapes, societies, production: a city.

Read More »