At the excellent Human Landscapes, Erle Ellis (you may know him from his Wired Science article from last May, “Stop Trying to Save the Planet”, which you should stop and read right now if you have not) suggests that we need to start thinking about (and, presumably, constructing) a “cyborg planet”, where machines can feed us data directly from nature (“clouds twitter and the forests all have facebook”), allowing us to understand ourselves and natural processes as part of a singular, networked planetary ecology — which already exists and which we are already conducting mass experiments on, whether we understand the web of connections or not. It’d be sort of like following @pothos (see Pruned‘s write-up of that experiment) or texting the fish in the Living Architecture Lab’s “Amphibious Architecture”, but at a mass scale, with, as Ellis suggests, satellites and social networks and smart grids and climate models integrated and then exploded back outward as a panopticon of data streams and feedback mechanisms.
-
recent posts
- an atlas of iphone landscapes
- delaware dredge
- schafran on race and foreclosure
- dry commonwealths
- metro international trade services
- emergency interventions
- dredge @ studio-x nyc
- everyday structures
- bracket [at extremes]
- signs for naturalized areas
- dharavi: globalization and spontaneously mixed uses
- hypothethical signs
- the network as industry
- cellular confinement
- low roads and architecture
-
recent comments
- car scratch: Great reporting, Tyler
- Legal Herbal High: herbs and natural remedies to protect our skin from acne, pimple, scars, marks and wrinkles....
- Herbs Legal High: in cigarettes today than ever before. this is just another ploy to make money. see, if you make it...
- rob: Barry, that’d be great. We just have a few days but I’d enjoy it if it works out. I’ll be in...
- Herbal Smoking: as physically. burned as an incense, twined into a wreath, or grown in a pot, rosemary protects the...
- barry lehrman: Congrats! Hope to see you when your in SoCal for the conference.
- thomas interior designer: this is a great picture, how can you get its? can i copy to my house design blog at...
- thomas interior designer: if In the early 20th century, east and west bound automobiles passed through Rochelle, how...
- work: http://www.szklarnia.sanok.pl/ szklarnia
- Time Management Techniques: [...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most...
-
monthly archives
-
category archives
-
tags
architectural-criticism architecture army-corps-of-engineers atchafalaya blogging china competitions dredge ecological-urbanism-at-gsd economics energy flood-control geology glacier-island-storm hacking-infrastructure highway hydrology incremental-urbanism informality infrastructural-vernacular infrastructure internet iphone kazys-varnelis landscape landscape-architecture landscape-infrastructures landscape-urbanism los angeles mississippi-river networked-urbanism new-urbanism photography post-industrial re-industrial reading-the-infrastructural-city readings soccer soft-systems suburbia technology transportation urbanism video-games waste
not sure i agree with his all-encompassing argument? ie some can continue to trash the planet AND others can try to clean it up?
I don’t think that’s his point at all. While he does say that “we humans can totally trash the planet and still survive”, he’s not saying that’s a good thing, as he explains in a clarification here.
What he is saying is that there is no longer such a thing as a “nature removed from human influence”, which is entirely correct. In that, he’s being descriptive, not assigning moral value (though he does later assign value as he defends the ecological virtue of human landscapes, which is again correct).
Thanks for the clarification rob.. makes sense to me ;)
[...] a ?cyborg planet? ? mammoth /"Erle Ellis suggests that we need to start thinking about (and, presumably, constructing) a ?cyborg planet?, where machines can feed us data directly from nature (?clouds twitter and the forests all have facebook?), allowing us to understand ourselves and natural processes as part of a singular, networked planetary ecology ? which already exists and which we are already conducting mass experiments on, whether we understand the web of connections or not…"(tags:eco comms ) [...]